<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can OnLive work?  Sony says yes, we already do it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlivemedium.com/2009/04/13/can-onlive-work-sony-says-yes-we-already-do-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlivemedium.com/2009/04/13/can-onlive-work-sony-says-yes-we-already-do-it/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Downin</title>
		<link>http://www.onlivemedium.com/2009/04/13/can-onlive-work-sony-says-yes-we-already-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Downin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlivemedium.com/?p=314#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Interesting points.  Macroblocking does seem to be a bit of an issue, but I am mainly focusing on SD streaming here and there may be less of a problem with it than in HD.

As far as Remote Play goes, it is my understanding that it also works over the internet, not just local networks.

Your skepticism is well-founded.  It&#039;s great that people are trying to innovate though.  If OnLive doesn&#039;t get it right they will hopefully be a step in the right direction and promote more people to pursue this technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points.  Macroblocking does seem to be a bit of an issue, but I am mainly focusing on SD streaming here and there may be less of a problem with it than in HD.</p>
<p>As far as Remote Play goes, it is my understanding that it also works over the internet, not just local networks.</p>
<p>Your skepticism is well-founded.  It&#8217;s great that people are trying to innovate though.  If OnLive doesn&#8217;t get it right they will hopefully be a step in the right direction and promote more people to pursue this technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tahiri</title>
		<link>http://www.onlivemedium.com/2009/04/13/can-onlive-work-sony-says-yes-we-already-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahiri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlivemedium.com/?p=314#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&quot;but all eyes-on reports seem to point to the fact that OnLive’s is very good&quot;

No they don&#039;t. I&#039;ve read many complaining of macroblocking, which isn&#039;t an issue with RemotePlay.

Also, RemotePlay dedicates a single machine for the user, which OnLive doesn&#039;t do. RemotePlay has a server in the user&#039;s house, OnLine has them located hundreds of miles away. RemotePlay uses stereo, OnLive claims to use surround sound.

And people still complain RemotePlay is too laggy. If RemotePlay can&#039;t do it, OnLive can&#039;t.

I can&#039;t believe idiots are buying into this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but all eyes-on reports seem to point to the fact that OnLive’s is very good&#8221;</p>
<p>No they don&#8217;t. I&#8217;ve read many complaining of macroblocking, which isn&#8217;t an issue with RemotePlay.</p>
<p>Also, RemotePlay dedicates a single machine for the user, which OnLive doesn&#8217;t do. RemotePlay has a server in the user&#8217;s house, OnLine has them located hundreds of miles away. RemotePlay uses stereo, OnLive claims to use surround sound.</p>
<p>And people still complain RemotePlay is too laggy. If RemotePlay can&#8217;t do it, OnLive can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe idiots are buying into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
